Books – IN November, I was found guilty of "racial harassment" for reading a public-li brary book on a university campus. For reading an anti-KKK book.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
suzanemichel
altnrg
MaryLynn_
MacBookForMe
romeohoover1968
rhettdejesus1975
BlackoliveNY
yarrkz24
adrielh791966
shawnmartinez1960
getbackerzoo
asolious
Dicax_Maximus
Iris-Iris
humemacdonald
RedRiverJ
HOUSEMD
Daylight
doppich
birddog54
alamala
nowsourcing
AlphaGnosis
contentmanager
HiHoney
digitalfever
BJTJ
rifftags
messparks
ArgoNunya
NoSpinDave
ML2007
berkeley
TweekerchickQC
schristoforides
nightcrawlerX
urmilskamas
Nowalive
mcarpentry
robear
jumpmaster
sleepingbeauty2
NewsLine
IRONBLUEEYES
Macas
tamsIlass
132)
Something that we can look forward to more of in a post-racial Obama regime.
And why is that?
Because his wife and his preacher are bigots. Why should we think he is any different?
You got that right tangy!
YOu betta not vote fo rObama cause hes gointa round you up and put shackels on you and Bobo!!
Clang, clank, clang ... here comes da judge!! Hes comin with the shackels!!
Boy, you in a heap o trouble now!!
I tell you what! The Right Wing Mainstream MEdia has got me and all my white friends all SCAIRT!
Im so scairt!!
My knees is shakin!
My tooths is a chatterin!
Thanks Bobo!! I appreaciates your ongoin efferts at spreadin hatred and division!
YOu do justice to your paid position as a Dallas County Republican Shill!
Yippee!! Bring on the ignorant commentary!! Bobos in da house!!
Smells like you dropped a little sumptin in yo britches too Goppy.(Pew!) Must-a slipped out when you wuz doin all that shakin and chatterin.
Personally, I wouldn't hesitate to vote for him, if he had ever shown any skills in leadership, or had actually accomplished anything other that being elected.
"Smells like you dropped a little sumptin in yo britches too Goppy"
Thats why we call him Poopy!!!!!!
Goppy for you to stop receiving all these negative vote is you need to be a bit more subtle with your satire. You can't just go around blatantly calling these dumb$#@%s dumb$#@%s! I liked it better when some of these dolts would give you a positive! ;-)
The one who smelt it dealt it! You are the only bigot here so far.
Obviously you have been dropped on your head once or twice. I sure would love for you to tell me how I am a bigot though.
You idiots took a good story and turned it into a racial bigotry story. First I saw the story. I then read it. It was a good opinion piece. So then i decided to look at the comments. Crap! SOS, different day. Infantile minds continue to play mindless games on here and disenfranchised voters and ideologists latch on to it. I was about to vote for this story after I read it, but now I'm sending it to the bowels of the earth where it belongs. It's a shame that everything these neocons touch goes to the crapper. Shame on you Bobo.
Hey Jovial, don't look now but you are alone in your views. Don't you kinda wonder why you are alone in the sink column? Maybe it's you who needs be ashamed.
An appeal to the majority.
We saw how well that argument worked out in the run up to war with Iraq.
An appeal to the majority would indicate I was asking for something. I asked for nothing. I merely pointed out the obvious. Nice try, though. Very typical to try to tie everything in the universe back to the war in Iraq.
I had flowers coming up today in the garden. And it was because of the war in Iraq...
"An appeal to the majority would indicate I was asking for something."
No it does not. An appeal to majority is a logical fallacy where one appeals to the majority for support of his conclusion.
In this case you tried to support your implication that jovial should be ashamed for his views because he was alone in his views, i.e. you are using alleged MAJORITY support as confirmation of your conclusion.
Do you get what appeal to majority is now?
If not, look it up in another source, THEN OPINE.
"...An appeal to majority is a logical fallacy where one appeals to the majority for support of his conclusion...."
Yes, kind of like the global warming alarmists insisting on making us all think that the world is oming to an end if we don't join their 'religion'.
Appealing to the majority and expert majority opinion are two different things.
"An appeal to the majority"
Yes, because only in the liberal mindset is the minority more important than the majority.
Its called SIMPLE MATH!
"Yes, because only in the liberal mindset is the minority more important than the majority.
Its called SIMPLE MATH"!
Sm-Why did you give this story a positive vote if you believe mob rule trumps individual rights? In this case the university was the majority and the custodian was the minority-do you favor his termination?
Hey Todd, don't look now, but you are wrong. He is not alone. Jovial hit the nail on the head. I didn't sink the article because it was a good article, but I do sink your ignorance for not being able to read the article and get the meaning out of it. It is people like you and your ilk who are exactly like the affirmative action officer and the Union officials who blindly and falsely accused the white man. You now falsely and blindly accuse Obama for what you perceive as wrong associations. Since you associate yourself with the likes of BoBo and Tanglang, according to your own line of reasoning, I must assume you want to brand Obama, his wife and their FORMER pastor as bigots and/or racists. That in turn, because of your association, makes you a racist, bigot and supporter of David Duke and the KKK.
Wrong yet again! Don't you ever get tired of that?
Only a real effing moron would think that someone who speaks out against obvious black racism is a white racist.
Why, you are guilty by association, Tanglang. So, you come to defend yourself. WOW. You and all you associate with aren't speaking out against black racists because you have demonstrated no proof that Obama, Wright, or Obama's wife are racist. You come on these threads and keep saying so and as proof, you talk about who they associate with. Another words, moron, you falsely accuse them for the sole purpose of discrediting them to sway voters and an election. But, when I point out your own associations and inconsistency, you get hot and call people morons. LOL So, you don't want a black to be President not because of his stance on issues, but because of who he associates with, other blacks and black churches. hmmmm Now, that sounds like racism to me. Being white, I can say that. Also, it sounds like what David Duke and any good white Supremacist might think or say. Therefore, you are guilty by association, just like you accuse Obama of. How does it feel you racist?
I am guilty by association? What associations? YOU??? Wright and Michelle Obama's own words tell us that they are racists.
I love how you call me a moron while screwing up your words at the same time. It's not "Another words", it's "In other words". D'oH!
Did I call you a moron today? No. I probably should have though.
Again, what associations?
Did I ever say I don't want a black man to be President? No, numb nuts I didn't! I think Condi Rice and Mike Huckabee should have been on the ticket. Then again wright did call her a "house ni__er" so I guess she does not count.
How does what feel? Being called a racist by some dribble lip retard? I does not bother me one bit seeing as how you don't matter to me. My girl is upset though. She can't figure out "why I waste my time on such a moron." I tell her that you amuse me with your antics.
Nice catch, it is in other words, but there is a such thing as another word. Talking about screwing up words, Your use of D'oh! certainly brings out your juvenile mentality of the Simpsons, which by the way is a trademark of 20th Century Fox and the apostrophe is not found in the Oxford English Dictionary. Your illegal use of the word just makes you look ignorant. The proper word usage would have been duh or doh.
Wright and Michelle Obama has never called themselves a racist, so, just what words lead a racist like you to think otherwise?
"Did I ever say I don't want a black man to be President?" That sounds exactly like the argument I am making about Wright and Obama. They never said they were racists either.
Dribble lip retard? Aren't we clever. You cannot answer the questions, play dumb and call names. How juvenile.
My illegal use of the word? HA! (That's from Mrs Crabapple) I used the word because I wanted to. It explained the look on your face when you read my post. BTW, The Simpsons is the highest grossing and longest running prime time show of all time.
"Wright and Michelle Obama has never called themselves a racist"
Neither did Robert Byrd.(D) Klansman!
I can try to play dumb all day and still be on a higher plane than you pal. You can't even show me where I said that a black man should not be POTUS. Pobabaly because I did no such thing.
No, pal, because you implied it. Everything with your kind of ilk is about innuendos, and your juvenile attitude about "its the longest prime time show of all time" is proof to me just how juvenile you really are. You quote a cartoon as if it is important in real life and really matters. Here is a link to show you might point again because you are too stupid to catch on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D'oh!
Notice you violated the trademark of 20th century fox in the use of the word. Frankly, I don't give a damn, but the fact you don't know you did and are still arguing about it says volumes about your stupidity. That you know and quote the characters of The Simpsons like Edna Krabappel (you misspelled Crabapple you asinine pompous arrogant little juvenile jerk) shows just how childish you really are.
You claim you play dumb, no, pal, you are dumb. You toy with politics by insinuating good people are haters and racists because you want to discredit their reputations.
No he's not! I agree with him totally and I'm going to sink it too, and you can thank yourself and tanglang, all the usual suspects for my sink.
Then sink it already and quit yer bitchen!
bitchen is properly spelled bitchin in the Merriam Webster Dictionary. Bitchen is a variant slang of the word. Just thought you would want to know I know how low class you really are.
jovial makes an excellent point.
This is an issue where Libs and Cons could come together to work to prevent BS like what happened to Sampson from happening again and what happens?
Obama aspersions.
Nicely played Cons. Your irrationality is showing again.
It appears that we have. At this time it's 82-jovial.
But of course everyone except him has got it wrong.
So are you repudiating your initial gambit?
BoBo, not everyone but him has got it wrong, but you are on the right track. When you take an article of this and try to twist it to support your perverted world views, then you have it all wrong, and anyone supporting your perversion also has it wrong. There are a lot of people out there, the David Duke types, who would be glad to join you in bashing Obama so he won't be the next President. You are so blind you cannot see your perversion includes the same blinded perversion of the affirmative action officer and the Union official in the article. You see yourself as the white man who is just simply pointing out truth, but the problem with that is you are pointing out right wing propaganda which is based on lies. So, what is new here? Nothing. The article was a very good and enlightening article I found to be right on target. Unfortunately, we both see it through different perspectives and world view. I am not a bigot.
"... This is an issue where Libs and Cons could come together..."???
It is the liberal mindset, i.e.: political correctness (a.k.a. thought police), that continues to divide us.
Possible meaning for liberal- Merriam Webster online Dictionary:
1 a: of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts: of or befitting a man of free birth
2 a: marked by generosity : openhanded b: given or provided in a generous and openhanded way c: ample, full
3obsolete : lacking moral restraint : licentious
4: not literal or strict : loose
5: broad-minded; especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms
6 a: of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism b: of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives
Of which definition you saying divides us. Please pick your poison.
ML2007,
You missed the New American Political Dictionary
liberal - (noun)
1: spawn of Satan
2: bringer of taxes
3: possibly homosexual
4: unbeliever
ant: God Fearing American
Oh, you mean the dictionary supported by Fred Phelps and his fundamentalist friends, the true anti Christ since they deny Jesus came in the flesh (I John).
Imagine that! Dropped on my head once or twice and STILL light years more intelligent than you!
If that were remotely true you would be able to explain to me why I am a bigot.
I thought Clinton won Indiana?
A great article. Too bad some of your missed the point in the article. The man has a lot in common with Obama's wife and preacher. These two people have read their own books and come to their own conclusions about things, and now you brand them a bigot for what reason? Because you just say they are? Tangy, you sound like you and the affirmative action officer and even the Union official have a lot in common. You want to judge someone before finding out all the facts. Your twisted mind somehow thinks the article gives you a license to be just like them. Interesting isn't it? You cannot document where the preacher or Obama's wife are bigots, yet, you make the accusation as if it is fact. So now, why should I believe you are any different than what you appear to be, a bigot yourself.
"...You cannot document where the preacher or Obama's wife are bigots..."
You're kidding, right?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120545277093135...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352661,00.html
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/20/michelle-o...
LOL. You are kidding, right? You send me three Conservative media spin artists and I am suppose to suck up everything they say as truth? Kessler works as a journalist for Newsmax.com, a Conservative organization according to Wikipedia. Wow, a great authoritative source. Even then, he only insinuates in your link the bigotry by Wright was in making anti Zionist statements, and that makes him, according to the journalist, a bigot. He makes the same judgment about Wright that your ilk and David Duke always make, he says because of Wrights association with people like Farrakan, he suggests he is a racist and bigot. Wow, it sounds just like you all over again. He alludes to Obama's wife because she sits with him during Wright's sermons, again, guilty by association. In every case, Obama decried the opposite of what this man says, but you still want to believe your conservative propaganda master despite his taking out of context what the preacher said. continued
The Fox News, in your next link just sends a video of the sermon Wright preached referred to as the "God Damns" sermon, and they ask you to decide for yourself. Well, being a retired preacher, overall, I certainly don't see racism or bigotry involved in the sermon. I see a couple of conspiracy theories dropped as illustrations in passing, but overall, I have no problem with the sermon and understand the context in which it was given. Maybe you can shed some light on why you think it shows bigotry. Here is a better link to he sermon in a nutshell. The outline of the sermon I thought was rather good.
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/21/the-full-...
continued
In your last link, you serve up Michele Malkin, another socially and political conservative who works for the media right, which makes her in your opinion, a real expert on Michelle Obama. Her expertise is the fact she disagrees with one comment taken out of context by Michelle Obama and that was the comment, "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change."
And, somehow, you want to equate this statement with bigotry.
Then she goes off into a tirade of how she thinks Michelle should have responded.
So, these three links are your proof of their bigotry. I suspect the real bigot here is you. You are no different than the Affirmative Action Officer and the Union Official in the article. All the people you have used to support your view are spin masters, trying to spin people like you to their way of thinking, and you go for it. LOL
ML,
If you can't see that Wright is a bigot, then you'll never recognize a bigot.
Really? Maybe you can enlighten me on how so? You read my comments and you still say I cannot recognize a bigot. Maybe you should look in the mirror, dude?
Why is it that any time anyone points out a racist black man for being such all you can say is that they themselves are racists?
You have no arguable defense so you resort to "I know you are but..."!
You have no proof other than by association that Obama or Wright are racists. Where is your proof? I defended the one man that brought me three conservative links, opinions from ultra NeoCons, that Obama, his wife, and Wright are racists and all you did was neg, no response. Even McCain says he doesn't believe Obama to be a racist saying he has known Obama a long time. Since I have turned the tables on you by association and the things you have posted yourself, I say you are racist by the same criteria and you cry foul. LOL You and your best friend, David Duke, are racists. David agrees with everything you are saying about Obama. Therefore, your association with his beliefs makes you just like him according to your line of reasoning about Obama. I can only guaranty you one thing, you continue to show up on these threads trying to discredit Obama by innuendos and through association, then expect the same in return. Do you catch yet, dumb ass?
Your defense was weak. Just as it is now. God forbid you read 'conservative' links. Whatever the hell that is.
"Ultra neocons"? Just go ahead and say what you really mean "Jews, or K__es".-Larry Wachs We all know that's what the left means when they say "neocon" anyway. Stop trying to mask your hate.
Since you have turned the tables on me by association? WTF??? What tables? What associations? The only bigot I associate with is YOU! The things I posted myself? Care to share that with the rest of the class?
"David [Duke] agrees with everything you say about Obama" You talked to him lately? Is that idiot still breathing?
"Therefore, your association with his beliefs makes you just like him according to your line of reasoning about Obama"
I barely know who that guy is and have never even seen him in person. (Why would I?) Obama sat in wrights church for 23 years. Slight difference.
How you gonna call me a dumb ass after typing this atrocity "guaranty"? Spell check numb nuts!